SAC Minneapolis to SAC Seattle re NORJAK

Document date 5 December 1973

Part 76page 1341 pageDB Cooper-33165

Part of: SAC Minneapolis to SAC Seattle re photo display to witness, lead to Chicago at Schaumburg · 5 December 1973 · Part 33 pp. 72–73

Open in FBI Vault (Part 76, page 134 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-76:134-134

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-76:134-134

Document: Airtel SAC Minneapolis to SAC Seattle re NORJAK
Id: Cooper-Part-76:134-134
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-76%3A134-134

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 76 p. 134 (DB Cooper-33165), Airtel, dated 5 Dec 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-76%3A134-134

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 12/5/73

SAC, MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) (P)

NORJAK OO: SEATTLE

---

Re: Minneapolis airtel to Seattle, 7/5/73. Seattle airtel to Denver, 11/23/73. Los Angeles airtel to Seattle, 11/15/73. Seattle airtel to Denver, 11/9/73.

---

Enclosed for Chicago is one copy each of photographs of suspects [REDACTED]

For the information of Seattle, Stewardess [REDACTED] has been residing at [REDACTED] Schaumburg, Illinois [REDACTED] since July, 1973.

[REDACTED] Inver Grove Heights, Minn., was contacted on 11/27/73 by SA [REDACTED] and was displayed photographs. [REDACTED] provided the following information:

Re: [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised that the photograph of [REDACTED] did not in any way resemble the unsub.

Re: [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] complexion as appearing on the photograph was very similar to that of unsub. She advised that the profile is in no way a resemblance to that of unsub.

---

2 - Chicago (Enc. 2) 2 - Seattle 2 - Minneapolis [REDACTED] (6)

---

Sub HH [illegible date, possibly 11/[illegible]/81]

---

DB Cooper-33165

Serials: MP 164-73, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.