Seattle to Minneapolis re NWAL and insurance company contacts in NORJAK

Document date 13 July 1976

Part 76page 2281 pageDB Cooper-33266

Part of: SAC Minneapolis to SAC Seattle re Northwest Airlines participation in serial number program · 13 July 1976 · Part 38 pp. 24–25

Open in FBI Vault (Part 76, page 228 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-76:228-228

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-76:228-228

Document: Airtel Seattle to Minneapolis re NWAL and insurance company contacts in NORJAK
Id: Cooper-Part-76:228-228
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-76%3A228-228

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 76 p. 228 (DB Cooper-33266), Airtel, dated 13 Jul 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-76%3A228-228

FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)

FBI

Date: 7/13/76

Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)

Via AIRTEL A I R M A I L (Precedence)

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) SAC, MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) (RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJAK

OO: SEATTLE

---

Re Seattle Airtel to the Bureau dated 6/7/76.

For information of Seattle. [REDACTED]

Northwest Airlines (NWAL), Inc., was recontacted on 6/14/76 regarding the proposals mentioned in referenced Airtel. As a result, [REDACTED] again conferred with the President of NWAL and they again reiterated that they are strongly opposed to the FBI contacting their insurance company. Additionally, [REDACTED] advised that he does not feel the insurance company's interests are completely in line with those of NWAL. [REDACTED] reluctantly advised that he did not wish to reveal the names of the insurance company officials handling this matter and again stated that NWAL is concerned with the results that may occur with any additional publicity regarding the hijacking.

[REDACTED] stated that it was NWAL's contention that the reward proposals which were publicized previously were no longer in effect. [REDACTED] stated that the Northwest Employee who was most involved in the reward proposal has retired and it was DONALD NYROP's position that the reward had simply died out. President NYROP did not rule out the possibility that should some new information concerning a subject or suspect in this case come up, he would consider a reward payment.

---

2 - Seattle 1 - Minneapolis [REDACTED] (3)

Approved: __________ Special Agent in Charge Sent __________ M Per __________

*GPO: 1975 O - 590-092

---

[REDACTED] 11/4-[guess: 91] -7013 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED SERIALIZED _____ FILED JUL 1976

---

DB Cooper-33266

Serials: MP 164-73, SE 164-81