EC Seattle re status of NORJAK DNA Project (duplicate copy)

Document date 4 August 2004

Part 77page 2411 pageDB Cooper-33596

Part of: EC Seattle re status of NORJAK DNA Project · 4 August 2004 · Part 77 pp. 239–240

Open in FBI Vault (Part 77, page 241 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-77:241-241

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-77:241-241

Document: EC Seattle re status of NORJAK DNA Project (duplicate copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-77:241-241
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-77%3A241-241

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 77 p. 241 (DB Cooper-33596), Memo, dated 4 Aug 2004 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-77%3A241-241

(Rev. 01-31-2003)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 08/04/2004

To: Seattle Attn: SAC [REDACTED] ASAC [REDACTED]

From: Seattle Squad 5/ PSVCTF Contact: [REDACTED]

Approved By: [REDACTED]

Drafted By: [REDACTED]

Case ID #: SE 164A-81-DNA (Pending) SE 164A-81-9446 (Pending)

Title: NORJAK; CAA - Hijacking

---

Synopsis: To outline current status of DNA Project and reassign DNA subfile.

Reference: SE 164A-81 Serial 9393

Details: Major long term violent crimes cases in the past have clearly shown that the ultimate person charged/convicted had been previously contacted early in the investigation. This case is the only unresolved hijacking in U.S. history. The investigation is not bound by a statute of limitations, as hijacking was then a capital offense.

Referenced serial outlined a three step investigative plan to address the DNA profile that was recently obtained from an item belonging to the hijacker. As part of this plan it is essential to review each of the 1,057 subject subfiles opened in this matter so as to locate possible candidates for DNA comparison.

Step one, entry and comparison of the DNA profile into the CODIS system has been completed with negative results.

Step two, review of each subject subfile has been partially completed. 501 of the 1,057 subfiles have been reviewed by SA [REDACTED] (1-500, and subfile 1055). Five of these subfiles were selected for DNA followup based on criteria developed by SA [REDACTED]. This criteria included, the strength of the initial reason for opening subject, how or if the subject was eliminated, how well the subject could match characteristics of

---

DB Cooper-33596

Serials: SE 164-81-9446, SE 164-81-DNA