To SAC Minneapolis re female caller reporting possible D.B. Cooper
Document date 17 January 1991
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-79:023-023
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-79:023-023 Document: Memo to SAC Minneapolis re female caller reporting possible D.B. Cooper Id: Cooper-Part-79:023-023 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-79%3A023-023 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 79 p. 23 (DB Cooper-34331), Memo, dated 17 Jan 1991, serial 164A-SE-81 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-79%3A023-023
Memorandum
To : Sac Minneapolis 164A-SE-81 (P) Date 1/17/91
From : SA [REDACTED]
Subject: NORJAK CAA OO:SE
---
On 1/15/90 An a female caller advised that [REDACTED] may be D.B. Cooper. [REDACTED] drives a Buick Lic [REDACTED] Caller advised that he lives at [REDACTED] He is 5' 4" 150 lbs slim w/m and blk hair and [REDACTED]
Indices negative.
---
Serial 32 of this file shows Unsub to be w/m 5-10 to six feet tall, olive complexion, mid 40s at time of Hijacking. Attached is [REDACTED] d/l shoiwing him to be 5'7" with a dob of [REDACTED] does not fit the discription of unsub being shorter and much younger.
---
ON 1/17/90 Det [REDACTED] Bloomington P.D. [guess: advised] [REDACTED] is known to [guess: go] his dept and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] His probably was the caller in this [guess: matter] She has called his dept with information before. She does [guess: run] [guess: get] [guess: along] with [REDACTED] 1-164A-SE-81
---
DB Cooper-34331
Serials: 164A-SE-81, 164A-SE-91-69