SAC Seattle to SAC Los Angeles re Albert Nelson Faulkner

Document date 1 February 1972

Part 93page 1901 pageDB Cooper-41571

Open in FBI Vault (Part 93, page 190 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-93:190-190

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-93:190-190

Document: Teletype SAC Seattle to SAC Los Angeles re Albert Nelson Faulkner
Id: Cooper-Part-93:190-190
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-93%3A190-190

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 93 p. 190 (DB Cooper-41571), Teletype, dated 1 Feb 1972, serial PD 164-41-814 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-93%3A190-190

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 2/1/72

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code)

Via TELETYPE NITEL (Priority)

---

TO: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497)

FROM: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

NORJAK. OO: SEATTLE.

RE: PORTLAND TEL TO LOS ANGELES JANUARY TWENTYNINE, SEVENTYTWO.

RE: FNU FAULKNER, AKA "THE FOX". FROM REVIEW OF FILES AT SEATTLE, IT APPEARS THAT FNU FAULKNER MAY BE IDENTICAL TO ALBERT NELSON FAULKNER, PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED AS SUSPECT IN THIS MATTER BY [REDACTED], LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S OFFICE, AS MENTIONED IN LOS ANGELES TELETYPE DECEMBER TWENTYEIGHT, NINETEEN SEVENTYONE AND WHOSE LOCATION WAS VERIFIED BY TAMPA AS SET FORTH IN TAMPA TEL DECEMBER TWENTYNINE, LAST.-P-

(2)(CL)- Portland )(AM)

JSD/slb

---

164-41-814 SEARCHED......INDEXED...... SERIALIZED......FILED...... FEB 3 1972 FBI — PORTLAND

---

b6 b7C

Approved: ___________ Sent ___________ M Per ___________ Special Agent in Charge

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971-413-135 DB Cooper-41571

Serials: LA 164-497, PD 164-41-814, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.