Nitel SAC Los Angeles to SAC Sacramento re NORJACK suspect investigation

This copy: Part 93 pp. 237–240Also filed at Part 22 pp. 136–139 (primary)

This copy’s own title

(nitel) Los Angeles to Sacramento re NORJACK suspect - file copy

Document date 8 February 1972

Part 93pages 237–2404 pagesDB Cooper-41622–41624

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 22 pp. 136–139.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 93, page 237 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-93:237-240

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-93:237-240

Document: Teletype (nitel) Los Angeles to Sacramento re NORJACK suspect - file copy
Id: Cooper-Part-93:237-240
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-93%3A237-240

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 93 pp. 237–240 (DB Cooper-41622–41624), Teletype, dated 8 Feb 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-93%3A237-240

Page 1 of 4Part 93 p. 237

2/8/72

PLAINTEXT

TELETYPE NITEL

TO: SAC, SACRAMENTO FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497)

NORJACK.

RE SUSPECT [REDACTED], ALSO KNOWN AS [REDACTED] [REDACTED].

THE NAME OF [REDACTED] [REDACTED], LOS ANGELES, WAS PREVIOUSLY FURNISHED AS A POSSIBLE SUSPECT IN THIS CASE BY [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED], TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA, AND [REDACTED] [REDACTED].

[REDACTED] INDICATED THE REASON THEY WERE FURNISHING [REDACTED] NAME WAS DUE TO A CONVERSATION WITH

[REDACTED]

---

1 - Minneapolis (AM) (1) - Portland (AM) 1 - Seattle (AM)

164-497 crs:jc (4)

---

[handwritten] 164-4/1-845 SEARCHED [REDACTED] INDEXED [REDACTED] SERIALIZED [REDACTED] FILED [REDACTED] FEB 1 4 1972 FBI — PORTLAND

---

b6 b7C

b6 b7C

b6 b7C

LA 164-497

CALIFORNIA. [REDACTED] AND OTHER ASSOCIATES WHO KNEW [REDACTED] HAVE BEEN INTERVIEWED AND IT WAS ASCERTAINED THAT [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] ON NOVEMBER TWENTY-TWO LAST. [REDACTED] [REDACTED].

ON JANUARY TWENTY-FIVE LAST [REDACTED] [REDACTED], ADVISED HE CONDUCTED A SEARCH FOR [REDACTED] [REDACTED] OF NOVEMBER TWENTY-TWO LAST.

HE STATED [REDACTED]

[REDACTED]

HE LED [REDACTED]

[REDACTED]

ON JANUARY TWENTY-SEVEN LAST, [REDACTED]

- 2 -

---

b6 b7C

---

DB Cooper-41622

LA 164-497

---

[REDACTED], CALIFORNIA, WAS INTERVIEWED AND ADVISED [REDACTED] [REDACTED], BORN [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. SHE VIEWED AN ARTIST'S CONCEPTION OF THE HIJACKER AND STATED [REDACTED] DID NOT RESEMBLE THIS SKETCH. SHE DESCRIBED [REDACTED] AS FIVE FEET ELEVEN INCHES, ONE HUNDRED SIXTY POUNDS, BLONDE HAIR, BLUE EYES, WITH MEDIUM COMPLEXION.

SHE STATES [REDACTED] HAD NO FINANCIAL PROBLEMS OR DOMESTIC PROBLEMS. SHE CONTINUED STATING [REDACTED] [REDACTED].

SHE STATES [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED], HAD NEVER BEEN A PARACHUTIST, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

DURING NINETEEN SIXTY WHILE LIVING IN [REDACTED], OREGON [REDACTED] HAD TAKEN UP FLYING.

- 3 -

---

b6 b7C

---

DB Cooper-41623

LA 164-497

---

HE HAD OBTAINED A PRIVATE PILOT'S LICENSE BUT HAD LAST FLOWN IN NINETEEN SIXTY-TWO AS THEY MOVED TO CALIFORNIA AND FOUND FLYING TOO HAZARDOUS. SHE CLAIMED [REDACTED] HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF COMMERCIAL PLANES AND NEVER FLEW ON A COMMERCIAL PLANE AS HE WAS AFRAID TO.

---

IT IS NOTED THAT RATHER UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUND [REDACTED] ON NOVEMBER TWENTY-TWO LAST. [REDACTED] STATES HE HAS A PRIVATE PILOT'S LICENSE YET IS AFRAID TO FLY ON COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT, AND HE ONCE LIVED IN OREGON, WAS A PILOT, AND IS APPROXIMATELY THE SAME AGE, WEIGHT, AND HEIGHT AS THE UNKNOWN SUBJECT IN THIS MATTER.

---

SACRAMENTO AT SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA: WILL OBTAIN PHOTOGRAPH OF SUSPECT FROM RECORDS, CALIFORNIA DMV, AND SUBMIT TO SEATTLE, PORTLAND, AND MINNEAPOLIS TO ASCERTAIN IF ANY ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION REGARDING SUBJECT IS WARRANTED.

---

- 4 -

---

DB Cooper-41624

---

b6 b7c

Serials: LA 164-497

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.