Of the FBI Laboratory to Sheriff Eugene A. Cotton re unidentified female found near Woodland

Document date 6 April 1972

Part 94pages 110–1112 pagesDB Cooper-42168

Open in FBI Vault (Part 94, page 110 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-94:110-111

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-94:110-111

Document: Report of the FBI Laboratory to Sheriff Eugene A. Cotton re unidentified female found near Woodland
Id: Cooper-Part-94:110-111
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-94%3A110-111

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 94 pp. 110–111 (DB Cooper-42168), Report, dated 6 Apr 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-94%3A110-111

Page 1 of 2Part 94 p. 110

7-1a (Rev. 1-7-72)

REPORT of the FBI LABORATORY

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

To: Mr. Eugene A. Cotton April 6, 1972 [Sheriff] of Clark County Vancouver, Washington 98660 AIRMAIL

This examination has been made with the understanding that the evidence is connected with an official investigation of a criminal matter, and that the Laboratory report will be used for official purposes only, related to the investigation or a subsequent criminal prosecution. Authorization cannot be granted for the use of the Laboratory report in connection with a civil proceeding.

Re: UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE DECEASED John Edgar Hoover, Director FOUND NEAR WOODLAND, WASHINGTON YOUR NO. MARCH 20, 1972 FBI FILE NO. LAB. NO. PC-83876 BU [illegible] NU

Examination requested by: ADDRESSEE

Reference: Letter 3/30/73

Examination requested: [Fingerprints] [illegible] - Chemical Analysis [guess: 4/1-923] Fingerprints

Specimens: SEARCHED____INDEXED____ SERIALIZED___FILED___ Q1-Q2 two bones ~ APR 6 1972 FBI — PORTLAND Result of examination:

No soil of value for significance comparisons was found in the [fingerprint] [illegible] from Q1 or Q2.

No hairs or fibers were found in the [fingernail] [scrapings] from Q1 and Q2 or on [specimens] Q1 and Q2.

The fingerprints on specimens Q1 and Q2 were examined for any [identifiable] of value for [illegible] examina- tion but none were located.

You are being advised by separate report of the results of the fingerprint examination and the disposition

Page 1 1-Norjak (164-2111) (cover) 1-SAC, Minneapolis (1)SAC, Portland 1-SAC, Seattle (164-81)

[two circular stamps/seals, content illegible]

---

of specimens Q1 and Q2. The debris from specimens Q1 and Q2 is being returned under separate cover by registered mail.

---

Page 2 FC-[guess: 43076] KS

---

DB Cooper-42168

Serials: 164-2111, SE 164-81