Re second suspect photo shown to Portland and Seattle witnesses
Document date 23 April 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-94:200-201
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-94:200-201 Document: Teletype re second suspect photo shown to Portland and Seattle witnesses Id: Cooper-Part-94:200-201 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-94%3A200-201 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 94 pp. 200–201 (DB Cooper-42261–42262), Teletype, dated 23 Apr 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-94%3A200-201
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 4/23/72
Transmit the following in _____ PLAIN TEXT _____ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via TELETYPE URGENT (Priority)
---
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P) NORJAK
RE CURRENT UNIDENTIFIED SUSPECT.
SECOND PHOTO OF UNIDENTIFIED SUSPECT DISPLAYED AMONG SIXTEEN OTHER PHOTOS TO PORTLAND WITNESS [REDACTED], NORTHWEST (NWA) [REDACTED] SELECTED FOUR PHOTOS, INCLUDING THAT OF SUSPECT, AS MOST RESEMBLING UNSUB, BUT COULD NOT RANK THEM OR MAKE POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION. PORTLAND WITNESS [REDACTED], NWA [REDACTED], NOT AVAILABLE TO VIEW PHOTOS, BUT STOPS PLACED AND CONTINUOUS EFFORT BEING MADE TO SHOW PHOTOS TO HIM AT EARLIEST POSSIBLE TIME.
WITNESS [REDACTED], EUGENE, OREGON, FELLOW PASSENGER OF UNSUB DURING HIJACKING, VIEWED SECOND PHOTO AMONG OTHERS AND SELECTED IT AS SAME PHOTO DISPLAYED ALONE TO HIM AT 2:00 AM, 4/22/72 BY NEWSWEEK [REDACTED] STATES THIS PHOTO STRONGLY RESEMBLES UNSUB, MORE SO THAN ANY OTHERS OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE HUNDRED HE HAS VIEWED, BUT HE COULD NOT MAKE POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION. [REDACTED] FURTHER ADVISED [REDACTED] HIM BY TELEPHONE FROM SEATTLE AFTER ABOVE DISPLAY OF SINGLE PHOTO TO ADVISE HE WAS ALSO CONTACTING OTHER WITNESSES AND SHOWING THEM PHOTOS. IT SHOULD BE RPH
---
Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge
Sent 2[guess: 5]/4 M Per [signature]
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971--413-135 DB Cooper-42261
---
b6 b7C
- 2 - PD 164-41
---
NOTED THAT [REDACTED] ADVISES HE MADE NO IDENTIFICATION OF PHOTO DISPLAYED BY [REDACTED], BUT DECEIVED [REDACTED] BY STATING HIS RECOLLECTION OF UNSUB WAS TOO VAGUE TO RECALL.
---
b6 b7C
---
DB Cooper-42262