SA to SAC Portland re NORJAK, Hillsboro contact attempts and 2/11/74 interview

Document date 13 February 1974

Part 96pages 80–812 pagesDB Cooper-42990–42991

Open in FBI Vault (Part 96, page 80 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-96:080-081

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-96:080-081

Document: Memo SA to SAC Portland re NORJAK, Hillsboro contact attempts and 2/11/74 interview
Id: Cooper-Part-96:080-081
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-96%3A080-081

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 96 pp. 80–81 (DB Cooper-42990–42991), Memo, dated 13 Feb 1974, serial PD 164-41-1376 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-96%3A080-081

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum

TO : SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P) DATE: 2/13/74

FROM : SA [REDACTED]

SUBJECT: NORJAK

---

On 1/30/74, an attempt to contact [REDACTED] at [REDACTED], Hillsboro, Oregon, was negative. No one was at home.

On 1/30/74, a review of the Hillsboro City Directory showed that [REDACTED] is employed at [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Portland, Oregon.

On 2/11/74, [REDACTED], residence [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Hillsboro, Oregon, telephone [REDACTED] was contacted at her place of employment, [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Portland, Oregon, telephone [REDACTED] Extension [REDACTED]. She provided the fol- lowing information regarding [REDACTED]:

[REDACTED] advised [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Since the hijacking of the Northwest Orient Airliner, there have been numerous comments made to her that [REDACTED] may have been the individual referred to as D. B. COOPER. These comments have always been made in the form of a joke, and neither she nor anyone else has taken them seriously. The reason for these comments is that [REDACTED]

[REDACTED]

[REDACTED] was employed by [REDACTED] in Seattle, Washington, until [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. He has and is currently living at [REDACTED], Oregon. He is [REDACTED].

---

(2) Portland CLH:laa (2)

---

[guess: 164-41-1376] [illegible initials/date]

---

DB Cooper-42990

PD 164-41

---

[REDACTED] described [REDACTED] as being 5'7" in height, 155 pounds, medium build, medium brown hair, hazel eyes, DOB [REDACTED]. He has never been arrested to her knowledge [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] does not believe that the artist's drawings of the subject in this case resemble that of [REDACTED] . She displayed a photograph of [REDACTED], and he has hair. She does not believe that he has ever been involved in any criminal activity and is not the kind of person to be involved in this kind of activity.

In view of the fact that the description of [REDACTED] is not close to that of the subject in this case, and the photograph of him does not resemble that of the artist's drawing, no further investigation is being conducted in this matter.

---

b6 b7C

---

- 2 -

---

DB Cooper-42991

Serials: PD 164-41, PD 164-41-1376