SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJACK, enclosing FD-302 of photo spread display
Document date 13 March 1989
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-97:212-212
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-97:212-212 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJACK, enclosing FD-302 of photo spread display Id: Cooper-Part-97:212-212 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-97%3A212-212 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 97 p. 212 (DB Cooper-43748), Airtel, dated 13 Mar 1989 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-97%3A212-212
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLASEFTO ☐ UNCLAS Date ___3/13/89
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)
FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164A-41)(RUC)
NORJACK; CAA - HIJACKING (OO: Seattle)
Re Newark airtel to St. Louis, 11/15/88, and Kansas City airtel to Portland, 2/28/89.
Enclosed for Seattle are original and two copies of an FD-302, interview of [REDACTED].
Enclosed for Newark are two copies of FD-302.
In as much as there are no outstanding leads in the Portland Division, this matter is being placed in an RUC status.
---
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
2 - Seattle (Enc. 3) 2 - Newark (164A-402)(Enc. 2) 1 - Portland
---
DB Cooper-43748 -1*- 164A-SE-81-10 [REDACTED] Approved: __________ Transmitted __________ Per __________ (Number) Seal(d)imé) Serialized Indexed [Handwritten initials and date]
---
b6 b7C
---
93-749 [Initials/signature] Matthes [guess: Matthes]
Serials: NK 164-402, PD 164-41, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.