To SAC Charlotte re Mayodan, N.C. tip on D.B. Cooper composite
Document date 31 January 1983
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-97:246-246
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-97:246-246 Document: Memo to SAC Charlotte re Mayodan, N.C. tip on D.B. Cooper composite Id: Cooper-Part-97:246-246 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-97%3A246-246 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 97 p. 246 (DB Cooper-43784), Memo, dated 31 Jan 1983, serial CE 164-219-12 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-97%3A246-246
Memorandum
To : SAC, CHARLOTTE (164-219) (C) Date 1/31/83
From : SA [REDACTED]
Subject : NORJACK (00: SEATTLE)
---
On 1/31/83, [REDACTED], Mayodan, N.C., telephone [REDACTED], was contacted regarding information relating to captioned matter. [REDACTED] stated that several years ago he had observed the composite drawing of D.B. COOPER as it appeared in a magazine. This drawing closely resembled an [REDACTED] identified as [REDACTED], who resides in [REDACTED], N.C.
[REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] and an individual identified as [REDACTED] had discussed captioned matter during one of [REDACTED], and both [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] indicated that it would be easy to succeed in a criminal act such as perpetrated by D.B. COOPER. [REDACTED] became suspicious of their comments regarding the hijacking of this airplane, and after several years, deemed it necessary to notify the authorities. [REDACTED] further noted that [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] served in the Army or Air Force, perhaps in the capacity of paratroopers.
[REDACTED] stated that his suspicion regarding [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] stems from the resemblance of the composite drawing of D.B. COOPER and the facial features of [REDACTED], along with their discussion of the hijacking during the aforementioned [REDACTED] approximately [REDACTED] years ago. Furthermore, [REDACTED] bases his suspicion on the fact that both [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] are [REDACTED] individuals, who would certainly attempt such a feat.
In view of the non-specific nature of [REDACTED] allegations, no further investigation is being conducted re captioned matter. It is noted that no communication is being dispatched to office of origin in this matter in view of the non-specific nature of the allegations.
The conversation with [REDACTED] is being made a matter of record in view of his propensity to call other law enforcement agencies to discuss the D.B. COOPER incident. [REDACTED] has contacted Chief ED SHELTON, Mayodan, N.C. PD regarding the NORJACK case.)
---
SEARCHED _____ INDEXED SERIALIZED _____ FILED JAN 31 1983
---
(1) - Charlotte (1)
---
DB Cooper-43784
---
[guess: file] (6)
---
164-219-12
Serials: CE 164-219, CE 164-219-12