To SAC Seattle re witness Cord H. Z. Spreckel shown photographs of four suspects
This copy: Part 98 p. 115Also filed at Part 97 p. 343 (primary)
This copy’s own title
SA to SAC Seattle re Spreckel shown four suspect photos, none the subject in his opinion
— revised to match this copy’s own text.
Document date 30 November 1971
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 97 p. 343.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-98:115-115
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-98:115-115 Document: Memo SA to SAC Seattle re Spreckel shown four suspect photos, none the subject in his opinion Id: Cooper-Part-98:115-115 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-98%3A115-115 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 98 p. 115 (DB Cooper-44171), Memo, dated 30 Nov 1971 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-98%3A115-115
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) DATE: 11/30/71
FROM : SA [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: UNKNOWN SUBJECT; NORTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT #305, PORTLAND TO SEATTLE, 11/24/71 CAA-HIJACKING; EXTORTION OO: SEATTLE BUfile 164-2111
---
On 11/30/71, witness CORD H. Z. SPRECKEL was shown photographs of suspects GARY EVAN JOSEPH SANDAL, ROBERT HAMPTON KEELY, JOSEPH HENRY JOHNSTON and [REDACTED]. SPRECKEL advised that none of the four photographs displayed was the subject in his opinion.
---
[guess: RBSJ]:md (3)
---
cc - each [guess: susp] " [illegible]
---
Sub 9 164-81-[guess: 313] SEARCHED..........INDEXED........ SERIALIZED.........FILED........... NOV 2 0 1971 FBI - SEATTLE
---
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB COOPER-44171
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.