Airtel · SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect · 12 January 1978 · page 1 of 3AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 12 January 1978AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
SF 164-220
FJC/cad
---
After telling [REDACTED] his flight, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] could be boarded at Gate 34 at 6:45 PM, [REDACTED]
began wondering if passenger may be possibly identical
to the Subject in captioned case.
---
Description of Unsub, aka Dan Cooper, was
telephonically furnished to [REDACTED] through [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] SFIA. He was of the opinion that the
description was close to that of the above passenger,
[REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED] was thereafter exhibited a composite
photograph of Unsub and became quite un-nerved at what
he considered a close resemblance. He thereafter pointed
out passenger [REDACTED] as seated within the Passenger
Waiting area.
---
[REDACTED] was approached by SA FRANCIS J. COLLOPY, JR.
who identified himself as a Special Agent of the FBI with a
show of credentials. [REDACTED] furnished a [REDACTED]
driver's license numbered [REDACTED] reflecting the name of
[REDACTED] Nevada. His
birthdate was shown as [REDACTED] his height 6', his weight
150 lbs., and his SSAN [REDACTED] This license bore no
photograph of [REDACTED] He was questioned regarding the
name he used to purchase his ticket and stated that he had
used the name [REDACTED] standing for [REDACTED] He denied
knowledge of any hijacking by anyone named COOPER,
specifically [REDACTED] or D. B. COOPER and emphatically denied
participating in such activity himself. He was shown the
composite photograph of Unsub and agreed that it could
resemble him. He initially furnished [REDACTED] as his last employer,
[REDACTED] located on [REDACTED]
(number unknown, but cross-street [REDACTED]
California. Thereafter in conversation he gave the name
of his last employer as [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] California. He stated that he had
worked [REDACTED] and then advised
that these years had been [REDACTED] He stated that he
[REDACTED] since that time. He refused to supply the