Interview report (FD-302) · Interview of South Carolina subject re NORJAK · Transcribed 23 May 1975 · page 2 of 4AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Transcribed 23 May 1975AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
1. [REDACTED]
He also claimed to
have been in [REDACTED] told
him that he had been [REDACTED]
and while employed [REDACTED]
stated that [REDACTED] and
however, did not seem to [REDACTED]
stated
[REDACTED] and this
was easily discernible to him.
---
2. [REDACTED] has indicated [REDACTED]
Portland, Oregon, area during the time
of the sky-jacking. On November 24, 1971,
[REDACTED - large block]
1972 he told [REDACTED] that he had
just terminated his employment [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] throughout conversation
[REDACTED] never able to determine
whether [REDACTED] was [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] on November 24, 1971.
---
3. [REDACTED] appeared to cover his facial
features. While employed [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] a full beard.
[REDACTED] advised he always felt that [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] this beard was to hide his
facial features.
---
4. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] appearing to have a large
amount of money. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
He claimed that [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] advised that
he has in fact seen [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] further advised that
[REDACTED]