Part 10, page 120
DB Cooper-1344Serials LA 164-497
Document date 15 November 1976
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 10 p. 120 (DB Cooper-1344), Airtel, dated 15 Nov 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-10/pages/120
Transcript
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
LA 164-497
and submit to interview if such immunization were received. During this contact [REDACTED] stated he was not, at this time, at liberty to discuss details, names, or places but realized specific data would have to be made available if the United States Attorney (USA) was to arrive at a prosecutive opinion concerning the criminal liability [REDACTED]
---
On 11/9/76, [REDACTED] telephonically contacted the Los Angeles Office and was advised by SA C. ROBERT STRANGER that this matter had been discussed with Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Los Angeles, and AUSA [REDACTED] said he could grant no form of written immunization to Federal prosecution based on a set of hypothetical facts, however, he would be quite willing to discuss specific details with [REDACTED] At this time [REDACTED] stated [REDACTED] the hijacker, who used the name of COOPER while committing the crime [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED large block] information being furnished [REDACTED] COOPER may now be dead.
He said that his sole concern in this matter is protection [REDACTED] [REDACTED] against Federal prosecution [REDACTED] He felt the only way to insure this is to have some written document from the Government assuring they will not be subject to Federal prosecution [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED] COOPER. He understood the facts as presented to him indicated [REDACTED] COOPER took place after the crime was committed, [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
---
On the afternoon of 11/9/76, [REDACTED] telephonically contacted the Los Angeles Office and advised [REDACTED] the following
---
- 2 - DB Cooper-1344
---
b6 b7C b7D