Document date 15 November 1976AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
LA 164-497
hijacker if he could obtain some written document
immunizing [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] from prosecution. He continued stating
information he has [REDACTED]
[REDACTED — large block]
[REDACTED] stated he does not know the validity of his
information stating it could be [REDACTED].
He added that he has not [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
---
AUSA [REDACTED] advised [REDACTED] he would decline to
furnish any form of written immunization for anyone
based on a set of hypothetical facts. He advised [REDACTED]
that if [REDACTED] desires to voluntarily come
forth, identify himself, and discuss the details of [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] and these facts as
presented did not warrant Federal prosecution, he would
so advise [REDACTED] at that time. AUSA [REDACTED]
stated that if [REDACTED] desires
to prepare written specific details concerning [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] and submit it to him
for prosecutive consideration he would respond in
writing.
---
On departing the USA Office, [REDACTED]
inquired of SA STRANGER as to whether there had been
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED] the airplane. He was advised
that the FBI could not respond to specific questions
regarding details of the hijacking as the results of
investigation in this matter are necessarily confidential.
---
On 11/11/76, [REDACTED] telephonically advised he
was in the process of formulating a letter to submit
to the USA, Los Angeles setting forth the conditions
under which he believes [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] submit to interview regarding
this matter. At this time [REDACTED] advised he has now