AirtelSAC Portland to SAC Seattle re source's views on hijacker's survival1 March 1977page 2 of 2
reportLegibility: medium

Part 10, page 167

DB Cooper-1393Serials PD 164-41

Document date 1 March 1977

Open in FBI Vault (Part 10, page 167 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 10 p. 167 (DB Cooper-1393), Airtel, dated 1 Mar 1977, serial SE 164-81-1624 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-10/pages/167

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

PD 164-41

---

[REDACTED] advised that he has thought considerably about the hijacking in this matter and has concluded that it is not realistic to assume that the hijacker survived the jump. He said that in view of the very dense terrain in the drop zone area, he can understand why the hijacker's remains have not been found. He suggested that one way this might be facilitated

---

[REDACTED — large block of text removed under b6/b7C exemptions]

---

Information available to Portland indicates the wind believed to be in effect in the drop zone area at the time the hijacker parachuted was coming from the southwest. If that is the case and the Northwest engineers who computed the location of the drop zone and the prime line along which UNSUB presumably fell were using southwest wind information, then the calculations of the location of the drop zone may not be accurate. A shift of wind from the west to the south would push the east end of the prime line to the north in a counter-clockwise direction. It could cause previously unsearched territory to the west of the drop zone to be included in a new, amended drop zone.

---

LEAD

SEATTLE

AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Will consider causing a dicussion of this matter with the Northwest Airlines engineers who computed the drop zone in this matter to determine whether the information from [REDACTED] is of any significance.

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

---

DB Cooper-1393

---

- 2 -

---

b6 b7C