Airtel · SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re source's views on hijacker's survival · 1 March 1977 · page 2 of 2AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 1 March 1977AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 10 p. 167 (DB Cooper-1393), Airtel, dated 1 Mar 1977, serial SE 164-81-1624 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-10/pages/167
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PD 164-41
---
[REDACTED] advised that he has thought considerably
about the hijacking in this matter and has concluded that it is
not realistic to assume that the hijacker survived the jump.
He said that in view of the very dense terrain in the drop
zone area, he can understand why the hijacker's remains have not
been found. He suggested that one way this might be facilitated
---
[REDACTED — large block of text removed under b6/b7C exemptions]
---
Information available to Portland indicates the wind
believed to be in effect in the drop zone area at the time the
hijacker parachuted was coming from the southwest. If that is the
case and the Northwest engineers who computed the location of the
drop zone and the prime line along which UNSUB presumably fell
were using southwest wind information, then the calculations of
the location of the drop zone may not be accurate. A shift
of wind from the west to the south would push the east end of the
prime line to the north in a counter-clockwise direction. It
could cause previously unsearched territory to the west of the
drop zone to be included in a new, amended drop zone.
---
LEAD
SEATTLE
AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Will consider causing a
dicussion of this matter with the Northwest Airlines engineers who
computed the drop zone in this matter to determine whether the
information from [REDACTED] is of any significance.