Teletype · St. Louis to Phoenix and Seattle re Charles Edward Baker relatives · 3 December 1971 · page 2 of 2AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 3 December 1971AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 100 p. 142 (DB Cooper-45070), Teletype, dated 3 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-538 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-100/pages/142
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO
[REDACTED] HE WAS LAST KNOWN [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] SCHMIDT HAS NOT SEEN [REDACTED]
MANY YEARS.
---
SHE IDENTIFIED HENRY SCHMIDT AS A BROTHER OF HER FORMER HUSBAND,
JOHNNIE SCHMIDT NOW DECEASED. HENRY LIVES IN FULTON, MO. AND SHE
IS POSITIVE HE HAS NOT SEEN CHARLES EDWARD BAKER FOR MANY YEARS AND
WOULD ACTUALLY BE NO RELATION TO BAKER.
---
SCHMIDT DID NOT KNOW ANYONE NAMED [REDACTED].
BONNIE KEGLY, BRAGG CITY MO. AN AUNT OF CHARLES EDWARD BAKER WAS
INTERVIEWED. SHE STATED, BAKER HAD BEEN LIVING IN HAYTI MO. UP UNTIL
THREE WEEKS AGO, WHEN BAKER [REDACTED] SAID THEY WERE LEAVING
FOR CALIFORNIA. KEGLY HAS RECEIVED FOUR POSTCARDS FROM BAKER SINCE
HE LEFT. THE MOST RECENT WAS POSTMARKED AT [REDACTED] ARIZONA ON NOV.
TWENTYSEVEN LAST. THE POSTMARKS ON THE OTHERS ARE PARTIALLY ILLEGIBLE
AND NO DATES CAN BE ASCERTAINED, HOWEVER, ONE OF THEM WAS POSTMARKED
IN TEXAS AND ANOTHER IN JUAREZ, MEXICO. BOTH OF THESE WERE RECEIVED [B (cut off)]
KEGLY PRIOR TO THE ONE POSTMARKED AT KINGMAN.
---
INQURIY AT [REDACTED] IDENTIFIED [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] WHO COULD NOT BE LOCATED.
PHOENIX AT [REDACTED], ARIZONA, ASCERTAIN FROM [REDACTED]
WHERE BAKER WAS ON NOV. TWENTYFOUR LAST.
ST. LOUIS WILL RECONTACT BAKER'S RELATIVES [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] IN EFFORT TO DETERMINE HIS WHEREABOUTS.