Airtel · SAC Seattle to SAC Anchorage re NORJAK · 17 April 1975 · 1 pageAIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 17 April 1975AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: read it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 118 p. 262 (DB Cooper-54367), Airtel, dated 17 Apr 1975, serial SE 164-81-6525 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-118/pages/262
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
F B I
Date: 4/17/75
Transmit the following in ___________ PLAIN ___________
(Type in plaintext or code)
Via ___ AIRTEL ___________ AIRMAIL ___________
(Priority)
TO : SAC, ANCHORAGE (164-59)
FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK
OO: SEATTLE
BUfile 164-2111
RE: [redacted/blank box]
---
Re Miami airtel to Seattle, Anchorage and Oklahoma
City, 4/3/75, Seattle report of SA [redacted] dated
5/30/73.
For the information of the Anchorage Division,
there is no indication that unsub had any partners including
a stewardess in perpetrating this crime. As there is not
enough information contained in referenced airtel to make
a meaningful evaluation, Anchorage is requested to conduct
the investigation specified in referenced airtel. Prior
to conducting any investigation the agent covering the
lead at Anchorage should thoroughly review referenced report.
It is noted that in order for Oklahoma City to
be able to cover the lead at Oklahoma City, they would need
more descriptive data.