Part 119, page 167

Serials DN 164-98, SE 164-81

Document date 22 January 1976

Open in FBI Vault (Part 119, page 167 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 119 p. 167, Airtel, dated 22 Jan 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-119/pages/167

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

1/22/76

AIRTEL

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, DENVER (164-98)(P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE RE: STANLEY HAROLD ANDERSON

Re Seattle letter to Denver, 11/3/75.

For information Seattle, review of captioned file reflects Denver is not in receipt of Sacramento letter to Denver, 9/25/75, which apparently sets forth background info re captioned individual.

LEAD

SEATTLE

AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON: Furnish Denver copies of Sacramento letter to Denver, dated 9/25/75, so investigation re ANDERSON may be conducted as requested.

ARMED & DANGEROUS.

---

(2) - Seattle (RM)(AM) 2 - Denver DWL:sas (4)

---

[guess: Ser] 785 (appears twice, handwritten in cursive) [illegible handwritten sequence near stamp, possibly a file/serial number]

---

ESTABLISHED____ INDEXED____ SERIALIZED____ FILED____ JAN 26 1976 921 - SEATTLE

AI notes

Commentary by the AI model that transcribed this page. It may bring in context the page itself does not state. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

FBI AIRTEL dated 1/22/76 from SAC Denver to SAC Seattle regarding NORJAK case, requesting Seattle furnish Denver with copies of a 9/25/75 Sacramento letter concerning background information on Stanley Harold Anderson, noted as armed and dangerous. File copy distribution notation listing recipients (Seattle and Denver field offices) and preparer initials. Handwritten serial number annotation, likely a filing serial reference ("Ser 785"), appearing twice on the page; an additional handwritten number sequence near the stamp is illegible. FBI Seattle field office routing stamp dated JAN 26 1976 with checkboxes for established/indexed/serialized/filed processing steps.

Typed body text is clear and high legibility.
Handwritten annotations (notation near SUBJECT line and near the routing stamp) are faint/cursive and partially illegible.
Two small ink blot/dot marks appear at the top of the page, likely stray marks or hole-punch artifacts, not text.

Part 119, page 167

People

Places

Dates mentioned

Transcript