Teletype · Director to field offices re latent fingerprint comparison results · 23 December 1971 · page 2 of 2AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 23 December 1971AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 17 p. 222 (DB Cooper-5052), Teletype, dated 23 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-1524 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-17/pages/222
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
b6
b7C
---
PAGE TWO
[REDACTED] FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED] DOB [REDACTED] IN CHESHIRE
ENGLAND, [REDACTED] FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] REMAINING LATENT FINGERPRINTS WHICH IS TIP IMPRESSION
AND LATENT IMPRESSION COMPARED INSOFAR AAE POSSIBLE WITH FINGER-
PRINTS OF ABOVE NAMED INDIVIDUALS BUT NO IDENTIFICATION EFFECTED.
NO PALM PRINTS HERE FOR NAMED INDIVIDUALS. FINGERPRINT REORD FOR
[REDACTED] FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
TEMPORARILY NOT AVAILABLE. COMPARISONS WILL BE CONDUCTED WHEN
RECORD LOCATED AND YOU WILL BE ADVISED SSEPARATELY IF IDENTIFICATION
EFFECTED.