Document date 2 December 1971AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 24 p. 615 (DB Cooper-2808), Teletype, dated 2 Dec 1971, serial 16-81-522 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-24/pages/615
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE FOUR
BOTH MR. KRUEGER AND MR. NOLAN EMPHASIZED THAT OBTAINING
IR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE AREA CAPABLE OF YIELDING A PARACHUTE
WAS ANALOGOUS TO QUOTE FINDING A NEEDLE IN A VERY LARGE
HAYSTACK UNQUOTE. THEY NOTED THAT AERIAL IR PHOTOGRAPHY WORK
WAS ONLY A SINGLE ELEMENT IN ACCOMPLISHING THE OBJECTIVE AND
THAT THE REAL TASK INVOLVED THE ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
OF THE RESULTANT IMAGERY BY QUALIFIED SPECIALISTS. IT WAS
ESTIMATED THAT TO ANALYZE THE AREA INVOLVED IN CAPTIONED MATTER
WOULD REQUIRE AT LEAST A DOZEN MEN WORKING FULL TIME FOR AT LEAST
TWO OR THREE WEEKS. SUCH ANALYSIS COULD CONCEIVABLY COST THE
BUREAU AN UNKNOWN AMOUNT, BUT THE AIRCRAFT REQUIRED WOULD
PROBABLY BE PROVIDED FREE OF COST.
CONCERNING IMAGERY ANALYSIS AND DATA INTERPRETATION,
MR. KRUEGER SUGGESTED THE FOLLOWING AS BEING EXPERTS IN THE
FIELD: