Airtel · SAC San Antonio to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, RUC · 11 June 1973 · page 2 of 2AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 11 June 1973AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 31 p. 320 (DB Cooper-11582), Airtel, dated 11 Jun 1973, serial 164-31-4799 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-31/pages/320
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
SA 164-111
---
The foregoing information may not be reproduced
nor included in a report. If Seattle deems it necessary to
include the foregoing in a report, San Antonio should be
advised to obtain a subpoena duces tecum [REDACTED] in order that
the information may be obtained and set forth in an FD-302.
In view of Seattle's request [REDACTED] be conducted in a discreet manner, no subpoena is being
requested at this time.
---
LEAD
SEATTLE
AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON: If Seattle desires that
[REDACTED] be reviewed subsequent to the issuance of
a subpoena duces tecum, Seattle should so advise San Antonio.