Part 31, page 94

DB Cooper-11247Serials NY 164-627, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-4676

Document date 3 May 1973

Open in FBI Vault (Part 31, page 94 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 31 p. 94 (DB Cooper-11247), Airtel, dated 3 May 1973, serial SE 164-81-4676 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-31/pages/94

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

5-3-73

---

AIRTEL AIRMAIL

TO : SAC, New York (164-627)

FROM : SAC, Seattle (164-81)(P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: Seattle

[REDACTED]

---

Re New York letter to Seattle, 5-1-73.

The Latent Fingerprint Section advised 1-31-73 that NORJAK latents currently on file were not identical with suspect [REDACTED] fingerprints. They further stated no palm prints were available for [REDACTED]

---

All NORJAK eye-witnesses have been repeatedly contacted and viewed numerous photographs. Up to now they have been extremely cooperative, notwithstanding the many contacts they have endured both at work and at home. Based on the above, these witnesses will not be contacted to view photographs unless there is no other way to eliminate a suspect.

---

Accordingly, the following leads are being set forth:

LEADS NEW YORK AT ARDSLEY, NEW YORK

Will interview [REDACTED] to determine:

---

2 - New York 3 - Seattle RMI/k[guess: su] [initials] (5) [stamps: searched, serialized, indexed, filed]

164-81-4676 DB Cooper-11247

AI notes

Commentary by the AI model that transcribed this page. It may bring in context the page itself does not state. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

Date of document Header block of FBI AIRTEL memo from SAC Seattle to SAC New York regarding NORJAK case Reference to a prior New York letter and report from the Latent Fingerprint Section advising that NORJAK latent prints on file did not match a redacted suspect's fingerprints, and no palm prints were available. Statement that NORJAK eyewitnesses have been repeatedly contacted and shown photographs, and have been cooperative. Due to the burden on witnesses, they will no longer be contacted to view photographs unless necessary to eliminate a suspect. Sets forth investigative leads directing the New York office to interview a redacted individual at Ardsley, New York. Distribution list, agent initials, processing stamps, and case/document reference numbers at the bottom of the page.

Some redacted (blacked out) sections marked b6/b7C
Signature and stamps at bottom are partially legible

Part 31, page 94

Places

Dates mentioned

Transcript