Document date 4 January 1974AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 33 p. 244 (DB Cooper-12348), Airtel, dated 4 Jan 1974, serial SE 164-81-6062 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-33/pages/244
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
LA 164-497
---
On 1[redacted]/19/73, [redacted] advised telephone number
[redacted] was a published number which was disconnected
on [redacted]. The subscriber was [redacted]
[redacted] Van Nuys, California.
---
The billing for this telephone had been sent to
[redacted] at the above address and indicate[redacted]
had telephone services at [redacted] and residence phones of
[redacted].
---
On 12/20/73, [redacted]
[redacted] adjacent to the address of [redacted]
Van Nuys, California, positively identified the photo of
[redacted] as identical to a man who had operated
[redacted]. She
advised that [redacted] had [redacted]
[redacted] largely
[redacted]. She stated the [redacted]
[redacted]. She advised that the
[redacted] who has been in this area for some time. She did
not know the degree of association between [redacted]
[redacted] stated she had been a [redacted].
---
She stated that about two weeks ago on a Wednesday,
12/7/73, morning she had observed a sign in the window which read
[redacted].
---
She added that a couple of days prior to this a sign
had been observed in the window indicating [redacted].