Teletype · SAC WFO to Director re NORJAK suspect employment inquiry · 9 September 1975 · page 2 of 3AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 9 September 1975AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO WFO 164-169
---
[REDACTED] FURTHER ADVISED THAT ONE [REDACTED]
WAS INJURED AT THE SITE ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 16,
1971, IN A CAVE-IN AND [REDACTED] FELLS THAT [REDACTED] MAY HAVE
BEEN REPLACED BY [REDACTED].
---
[REDACTED] STATED THAT ALTHOUGH HE CANNOT RECALL WHETHER
OR NOT [REDACTED] WORKED THE DAY [guess: PRECEDING] THE THANKSGIVING
HOLIDAY, HE STATED THAT IF THE EMPLOYEE WAS TO RECEIVE
HOLIDAY PAY, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NORMAL PROCEDURE FOR THE
EMPLOYEE TO WORK BOTH THE DAY BEFORE AND THE DAY AFTER THE
HOLIDAY. HE FURTHER ADVISED THAT THE ONLY WAY AN INDIVIDUAL
WAS ABLE TO RECEIVE HOLIDAY PAY AND NOT WORK WAS IF THAT
INDIVIDUAL PRESENTED AN "EMERGENCY TYPE EXCUSE SUCH AS DEATH
IN THE FAMILY OR SERIOUS ILLNESS."
---
IN ADDITION, [REDACTED] STATED THAT FROM WHAT HE RECALLS
OF [REDACTED] OCCASIONALLY COMPLAINED OF UNKNOWN
FINANCIAL PROBLEMS AT HOME. [REDACTED] STATED THAT DURING THE
SPRING OF 1972, [REDACTED] SOLD HIM A [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] WHICH HE STILL OWNS FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING
MONIES TO MEET THESE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES.