Teletype · SAC Alexandria to Director re NORJAK suspect interview and description · 9 September 1975 · page 2 of 5AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 9 September 1975AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 36 p. 294 (DB Cooper-13852), Teletype, dated 9 Sep 1975, serial SE 164-81-4496 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-36/pages/294
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO (AX 164-72)
---
[REDACTED] SUBSEQUENTLY INTERVIEWED SEPTEMBER 8, 1975, AND
DENIED INVOLVEMENT IN CAPTIONED HIJACKING. [REDACTED] HOWEVER,
ADMITTED TO BEING A SKILLED SKYDIVER, A HUNTER AND SOMEONE AT
HOME IN ROUGH TERRAIN. [REDACTED] PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION, FURNISHED
BELOW, BEARS SOME RESEMBLANCE TO THAT OF UNSUB, HOWEVER, IT
IS NOTED THAT IN NOVEMBER, 1971, [REDACTED]
AND UNSUB IS DESCRIBED AS BEING IN HIS MID 40'S. ADDITIONALLY,
[REDACTED] HAS SEVERAL [REDACTED] WHICH ARE
NOTICABLE TO AN OBSERVER, NONE OF WHICH ARE PRESENT IN
DESCRIPTION OF UNSUB. PER TELEPHONIC REQUEST MADE OF THE
LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION, IDENTIFICATION DIVISION ON
SEPTEMBER 9, 1975, THE FINGERPRINTS OF SUSPECT [REDACTED] AS
CONTAINED ON HIS MILITARY FINGERPRINT CARD WERE COMPARED WITH
LATENTS DEVELOPED IN THE NORJAK CASE. THIS COMPARISON REVEALED
[REDACTED] AVAILABLE FINGERPRINTS NOT IDENTICAL WITH LATENTS.
---
DURING INTERVIEW, [REDACTED] ADVISED THAT HE WAS EMPLOYED IN
NOVEMBER, 1971, WITH THE POTOMAC CONTRACTING COMPANY, A DEFUNCT
SUBSIDIARY OF D. A. FOSTER, MERRIFIELD, VIRGINIA. REVIEW OF
RECORDS D. A. FOSTER COMPANY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1975, REVEALS THAT
COMPANY RECORDS REFLECT THAT FOR THE WEEK ENDING NOVEMBER 27,