Document date 23 July 1977AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 40 p. 161 (DB Cooper-15853), Teletype, dated 23 Jul 1977, serial SE 164-81-7699 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-40/pages/161
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO LV (164-62) CLEAR
---
UNAWARE OF THE PRESENT WHEREABOUTS OF [REDACTED] BUT EXPECT HIM
TO TELEPHONICALLY CONTACT THEM WITHIN THE NEXT SEVERAL DAYS.
THEY ADVISED THAT THEY HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF [REDACTED] FROM
COFFELT [REDACTED] SETTING FORTH THE DETAILS OF THE
HIJACKING. THEY STATED [REDACTED]
OF COFFELT [REDACTED] BY COFFELT,
HOWEVER, COFFELT IS NO RELATION [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] ADVISED THEY WILL INSTRUCT [REDACTED] TO IMMEDIATELY
RETURN TO LAS VEGAS FOR INTERVIEW WHEN HE CONTACTS THEM.
---
7-22-77 [REDACTED] TELEPHONICALLY ADVISED FBI LAS VEGAS
THAT [REDACTED] HAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED PHOTOGRAPHS OF
JAMES BRYANT COFFELT AS IDENTICAL TO D.B. COOPER.
---
[REDACTED] ADVISED [REDACTED]
DURING HIS INTERVIEW WITH HER. HE ADVISED [REDACTED] IS IN
[REDACTED] GIVEN TO HIM BY COFFELT WHICH CLAIMED
[REDACTED] WAS UNABLE TO DESCRIBE
OVER THE TELEPHONE [REDACTED] HOWEVER SOUNDED
ANXIOUS TO CO-OPERATE.
[REDACTED] DID NOT INTEND TO RETURN TO LAS VEGAS IN THE NEAR FUTURE
THEREFORE WAS ADVISED TO CONTACT SA [REDACTED] IN LOS ANGELES
WHICH HE AGREED TO DO.