Teletype · Minneapolis re individual claiming FBI permission for D.B. Cooper movie · August 1977 · page 2 of 2AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date August 1977AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 40 p. 205 (DB Cooper-1590), Teletype, dated Aug 1977, serial SE 164-81-7633 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-40/pages/205
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO MP 164-73 CLEAR
---
FILE FOUR PAGES LONG WHICH WAS SINGLE SPACED.
[REDACTED] TOLD [REDACTED] THAT HE, [REDACTED], HAD PERMISSION OF
THE WEST COAST FBI, FBI HEADQUARTERS IN WASHINGTON, AND
GRIFFIN BELL TO MAKE A MOVIE ABOUT THE HIJACKING. [REDACTED] HAD-
INFORMATION ON THE HIJACKING, BUT EVERYTHING HE KNEW COULD HAVE
COME FROM NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES. [REDACTED] DID NOT HAVE ANY
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
[REDACTED] HEARD FROM UNRECALLED SOURCE THAT [REDACTED] HAD
[REDACTED]
NEITHER [REDACTED] NOR ANYONE ELSE, HAS EVER TOLD OR IMPLIED
TO [REDACTED] THAT [REDACTED] OR ANY FBI EMPLOYEE, GAVE
[REDACTED] ANY FILE, OR ANY INFORMATION WHATSOEVER ABOUT THE
HIJACKING. [REDACTED] HAD NO FACTUAL BASIS WHATSOEVER FOR THE
THOUGHT SOMETHING ALONG THESE LINES CONCEIVABLY COULD HAVE
HAPPENED. THIS THOUGHT WAS THE RESULT OF PURE SPECULATION AND
CONJECTURE ON [REDACTED] PART.
[REDACTED] STATED HE WORKED FOR UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, AND HAD
ADDRESS, [REDACTED] CALIFORNIA [REDACTED]
BT