Part 45, page 112

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☐ —————— ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date _______________

---

PAGE TWO SE 164-81 UNCLAS

THE REAL HIJACKER. [REDACTED] PLANS TO WRITE A BOOK ON THIS CASE. [REDACTED] LED THE SEATTLE AND SAN FRANCISCO DIVISIONS TO BELIEVE THAT HE HAD OBTAINED A COPY OF THE POTENTIAL SUBJECT'S FINGERPRINTS FROM MICROFILM EMPLOYMENT RECORDS. [REDACTED] WAS TO PROVIDE THESE FINGERPRINTS TO THE SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ON JUNE 24, 1980. THE SEATTLE DIVISION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE BUREAU LEGAL SECTION HAS AGREED TO NOTIFY [REDACTED] IF THE PRINTS DO NOT MATCH, WITHIN FIVE WORKING DAYS FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE FINGERPRINT COMPARISON. IF THE PRINTS ARE IDENTICAL, THE FBI WILL MAKE ADDITIONAL CONTACTS WITH [REDACTED] AND HE HAS AGREED TO PROVIDE THE FBI WITH ALL OF HIS RESEARCH DATA.

BECAUSE OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE SEATTLE DIVISION REQUESTED THAT THE LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION OF THE IDENTIFICATION DIVISION EXPEDITIOUSLY COMPARE THE FINGERPRINTS THAT THE SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION WAS TO RECEIVE.

---

[REDACTED] APPEARED AT THE SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE ON THE AFTERNOON OF JUNE 24, 1980. HE EXPLAINED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE THE FINGERPRINT CARD FOR THE POTENTIAL SUBJECT. HE SAID HE DETERMINED THAT THIS INDIVIDUAL HAD WORKED FOR A GAMBLING ESTABLISHMENT IN THE LAKE TAHOE - STATELINE, NEVADA, AREA AND THAT

---

Approved: _______________ Transmitted _______________ Per _______________ (Number) (Time) ☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1980-305-750/5402 DB Cooper-18216