Airtel · SAC Miami to SAC Seattle closing NORJAK lead after photo comparison · 8 October 1981 · page 2 of 2AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 8 October 1981AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
MM 164A-552
---
photograph. He advised the photograph that was accompanied with the
letter was a photograph of his sister's wedding. In the photograph, he is
depicted on the far left-hand side, standing next to his mother. His
sister's husband previously was employed at Caravel Tru Color Studios.
Caravel Tru Color Studios' name and address was printed on the reverse
side of the photograph.
---
[REDACTED] was advised that he was not considered to be a suspect nor
was under any investigation regarding this matter. He was also advised of
the fact that retired SA [REDACTED] and current SAs, including SA
[REDACTED], have viewed his photograph and viewed the composite
photograph of the "NORJAK" suspect, and have deemed it not to be identical.
---
In view of the fact that SAs of the Miami Division who personally
know [REDACTED] have viewed the composite photograph of the "NORJAK"
suspect and determined it not to be identical, and in view of the fact
that no further investigation has been requested of the Miami Division,
this case is being placed in an RUC status.