AirtelSAC Oklahoma City to SAC Seattle re Norman, Oklahoma complainant (file copy)11 December 19811 page
fbi_formLegibility: high

Part 46, page 253

DB Cooper-19078Serials 164-244, PD 164-41, SE 164-81

Document date 11 December 1981

Open in FBI Vault (Part 46, page 253 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 46 p. 253 (DB Cooper-19078), Airtel, dated 11 Dec 1981 — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-46/pages/253

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 12/11/81

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)

FROM: SAC, OKLAHOMA CITY (164A-244) (RUC)

NORJAK CAA - HIJACKING (A) OO: Seattle

Re Las Vegas airtel to Oklahoma City, 10/1/81.

After numerous negative attempts were made to contact [REDACTED] Norman, Oklahoma, [REDACTED] was contacted 12/7/81. She advised that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and anything he says should not be taken seriously. She did not feel that any of the information furnished by [REDACTED] in referenced airtel was valid.

On 12/7/81, [REDACTED] Norman Police Department, was contacted. [REDACTED] said that [REDACTED] is one of the [REDACTED] who thinks that he can not only furnish valuable information regarding all the major unsolved crimes in the U. S., but that he can solve same.

In view of the above, no contact will be made with [REDACTED]

---

2 - Seattle 2 - Portland (164-41) 1 - Oklahoma City JAM:epm (5)

---

SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ DEC 1 8 1981 FBI - SACRAMENTO

---

Approved: _____________ Transmitted _____________ Per _____________ (Number) (Time) DB Cooper-19078