AirtelSAC Newark to Director re NORJACK suspect's Army and ROTC background24 July 19891 page
fbi_formLegibility: medium

Part 49, page 257

DB Cooper-20399Serials 164-2111, NK 164-402, RH 164-74, SE 164-81, SL 164-63

Document date 24 July 1989

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: read it.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 49, page 257 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 49 p. 257 (DB Cooper-20399), Airtel, dated 24 Jul 1989 — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-49/pages/257

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85) FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E.F.T.O. ☐ UNCLAS Date 7/24/89

---

TO: DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) FROM: SAC, [REDACTED] (164A-402) (C-1) SUBJECT: NORJACK OO: SEATTLE

Sub: [REDACTED] Re: Seattle Airtel to Bureau 7/7/89.

[REDACTED] served-in-the-US-Army-as-an-enlisted-man from [REDACTED] He took ROTC at the University of Michigan and again served in the US Army as a [REDACTED] [REDACTED] from [REDACTED] Review of military records reflect no receipt of airborne training.

Review of [REDACTED] reflects that Portland teletype dated 12/15/71 (copy to Seattle) requested photographs and background data re [REDACTED] inasmuch he was considered a possible Norjack suspect at that time. Minneapolis teletype to Bureau dated 1/6/72 (copy to Seattle) reflected that [REDACTED] photograph had been displayed to the three victim stewardesses. All three witnesses stated that [REDACTED] was not identical or similar to D. B. COOPER.

Based on the above information, Newark does not consider [REDACTED] a suspect in Norjack and will conduct no further investigation, UACB.

---

2-Bureau 2-Seattle (164A-81) 2-Richmond (164A-74) 2-St. Louis (164A-63) 2-[REDACTED] (1-164A-402) [REDACTED] BMM/lam (10) 1*

---

[guess: SEARCHED] [guess: INDEXED] [guess: SERIALIZED] [guess: FILED] JUL 28 1989

---

DB Cooper-20399