MemoTo SAC Seattle: NORJAK case summary and file-handling guide (The Crime, Statute of Limitations, Unsolved Mysteries, Indexing, Reward, Filing of Serials, Le23 September 1993page 7 of 11
reportLegibility: high

Part 50, page 384

DB Cooper-21082Serials SE 164-81

Document date 23 September 1993

Open in FBI Vault (Part 50, page 384 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 50 p. 384 (DB Cooper-21082), Memo, dated 23 Sep 1993 — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-50/pages/384

Places

Seattle

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

UNSOLVED MYSTERIES

Occasionally this crime is highlighted on Unsolved Mysteries.

The telephone calls fit into five categories:

1. SIGHTING - The caller had recently seen an indivdual resembling the artist's composite of UNSUB. (No lead) (15%)

2. RESEMBLANCE - The caller had an acquaintance who resembled the artist's composite of UNSUB. (No lead) (13%)

3. FORMER SUSPECT - The caller was suggesting a suspect that had been previously processed as a NORJAK suspect. (6%)

4. NEW SUSPECT - The caller was providing information on a new suspect. This information was dictated into Seattle File Number 164A-81 and appropriate leads have been set out. (4%)

5. NO LEAD - The caller did not provide any information of lead value. (68%)

Percentage figures represent average values and are for information purpose only.

---

DB Cooper-21082