Document date 2 December 1971AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: read it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
LA 164-497
PAGE TWO
---
ON DECEMBER ONE LAST, [REDACTED] VIEWED THE
ARTIST'S CONCEPTION OF UNSUB AND STATED [REDACTED] DOES
NOT LOOK LIKE SKETCH.
ON NOVEMBER THIRTY LAST, [REDACTED], WHO PREVIOUSLY
FURNISHED THE NAME OF [REDACTED] AS A POSSIBLE SUSPECT THIS
MATTER, WAS INTERVIEWED AND ADVISED ARTIST'S CONCEPTION
DOES NOT RESEMBLE [REDACTED] IN ANYWAY, STATING HE RECALLS [REDACTED]
FACE MORE ROUNDER. IT IS NOTED [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
NONE OF ABOVE BEING CONSIDERED SUSPECT BY LOS ANGELES.
RE SUSPECT [REDACTED]
ON NOVEMBER THIRTY [guess: LAST], [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] ADVISED [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED]
READ OF HIJACKING AND BELIEVED COOPER'S DESCRIPTION FAMILIAR
TO UNSUB.