Document date 6 January 1972AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE FOUR
LA 164-497
---
INQUIRY RECEIVED FROM EMPLOYER. [REDACTED] DISCARDED LETTER
DUE TO REPUTATION OF [REDACTED] BUT RECALLS MAILED FROM
WASHINGTON. THE LETTER INDICATED SHE WAS GOING TO
SEEK EMPLOYMENT AS [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED] APPEARS IDENTICAL TO SUBJECT OF [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED] REVIEW OF FILES REVEALED [REDACTED]
AND [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] IN APRIL
FIFTY NINE, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] WASHINGTON. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] FROM [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] FOLLOWING [REDACTED]
---
IN APRIL SIXTY NINE, SALT LAKE CITY REQUESTED BACKGROUND
INFO CONCERNING [REDACTED] WHO HAD BEEN IN CONTACT WITH CONVICTED
[REDACTED] WHO HAD SERVED SENTENCE. AND
WAS SUSPECTED OF COMMITTING NUMEROUS RECENT BURGLARIES.
[REDACTED] LOCATED RESIDING AT [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] CALIFORNIA, AND EMPLOYED AS [REDACTED]