Archive / Parts / Part 59 / Page 338
report Legibility: medium
Part 59, page 338 DB Cooper-24484
Document date May 1972 AI Dates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Transcript The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
All in violation of [REDACTED]
COUNT II
1. The defendants [REDACTED] also known
as [REDACTED]
[REDACTED - large block]
---
2. On or about the 16th day and the 20th day of
February, 1972 the defendants [REDACTED] also known
as [REDACTED]
[REDACTED - large block]
---
All in violation of [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
201
---
DB Cooper-24484
---
GPO: 1966 OF—264-458
AI notes AI These notes: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it. Commentary by the AI model that transcribed this page. It may bring in context the page itself does not state. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
End of a previous count referencing a violation of a redacted statute, followed by the beginning of Count II. Count II paragraph 1 names redacted defendants (also known as redacted aliases) with a large redacted block following.
Count II paragraph 2 states that on or about February 16 and February 20, 1972, the redacted defendants (also known as redacted aliases) performed actions described in a large redacted block.
Closing statement of Count II indicating all acts were in violation of a redacted statute or code section. Page number 201 at bottom.
FBI Vault Bates stamp identifier for the D.B. Cooper file.
Government Printing Office form identification number.
Multiple redaction boxes (b6/b7C exemptions) obscure defendant names, violation statutes, and other details Line-numbered legal document format Some speckling and scan artifacts Scan order ← p. 337 p. 339 →