Document date 28 April 1972AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE FOUR
SE 164-81
---
THE INDIVIDUAL IN THE PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN IN THE WIG ON PACIFIC AVE-
NUE IN BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, AND ALSO IS IDENTICAL TO THE INDI-
VIDUAL IN THE PHOTOGRAPH WITHOUT THE WIG MADE AVAILABLE BY [REDACTED]
TO NEW YORK OFFICE. [REDACTED] DENIES BEING INDIVIDUAL IN
PHOTOGRAPH WITH BLACK AND WHITE KNIT CAP, ALTHOUGH [REDACTED] ADVISES
ALL PHOTOS ARE OF SAME INDIVIDUAL. [REDACTED] ADVISED THAT PHOTOGRAPH
OF HIM WEARING THE WIG WAS TAKEN A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO IN FRONT
OF A WIG SHOP ON PACIFIC AVENUE, BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, WHEN HE
WAS IN THE COMPANY OF [REDACTED] STATES [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] TOOK HIS PHOTOGRAPH WITH A POLAROID CAMERA AND THAT THE WIG
WAS BORROWED FROM THE WIG SHOP UNDER THE GUISE OF PURCHASING SAME.
[REDACTED] ADVISED THE PHOTOGRAPH WAS TO BE USED BY [REDACTED]
TO BE SHOWN TO A FEMALE PURCHASER OF [REDACTED] AS
HE UNDERSTOOD THIS FEMALE EXPECTED TO BE ROMANCED AS PART OF THE
SALE. [REDACTED] STATES THE PHOTOGRAPH WAS NEVER SHOWN TO THIS INDIVI-
DUAL BECAUSE HE DECIDED AGAINST IT AND REQUESTED THE [REDACTED] NOT
TO DO SO.
---
[REDACTED] UNDERSTOOD THIS WOMAN RECEIVED A LARGE SUM OF MONEY,
EITHER FRO AN ESTATE A SELEMEN TH ANDAS INSD
END PAGE FOUR