Teletype · Director to field offices re latent fingerprint comparison results · 23 December 1971 · page 2 of 2AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 23 December 1971AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: read it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 66 p. 216 (DB Cooper-28014), Teletype, dated 23 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-1524 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-66/pages/216
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO
[REDACTED], FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
[REDACTED], FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED], DOB [REDACTED] IN CHESHIRE
ENGLAND, [REDACTED], FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. REMAINING LATENT FINGERPRINTS WHICH IS TIP IMPRESSION
AND LATENT IMPRESSION COMPARED INSOFAR AAE POSSIBLE WITH FINGER-
PRINTS OF ABOVE NAMED INDIVIDUALS BUT NO IDENTIFICATION EFFECTED.
NO PALM PRINTS HERE FOR NAMED INDIVIDUALS. FINGERPRINT REORD FOR
[REDACTED], FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
TEMPORARILY NOT AVAILABLE. COMPARISONS WILL BE CONDUCTED WHEN
RECORD LOCATED AND YOU WILL BE ADVISED SEPARATELY IF IDENTIFICATION
EFFECTED.
CONFIRMING.
END
DCA
FBI SEATTLE