Transcript The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FD-36 (Rev. 11-17-88)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION:
☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET
☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET
☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL
☐ UNCLAS E F T O
☐ UNCLAS
Date 1/16/92
---
TO : SAC, SEATTLE
FROM : SAC, PHOENIX (164-100) (RUC)
SUBJECT : NORJAK;
164-81;
OO: SEATTLE
---
SUBJ: MISC. (UNKNOWN)
[redacted block]
---
Enclosed for Seattle is the original and one copy
of a letter and newspaper article to FBI, Tucson, by [redacted].
Further investigation is being left to the
discretion of Seattle.
---
✓ INOICES
| ✓ 0[illegible]X [redacted]
---
2 - Seattle (Enc. 4) (RM)
1 - Phoenix
[redacted]
(3)
---
[stamp] COPY
[stamp] [guess: 164A]-SE-81-[illegible]
SEARCHED......... [illegible]
SERIAL[illegible]
FEB 5 1992
SubJ
---
Approved: _____________ Transmitted _____________ Per _____________
(Number) (Time)
DB Cooper-29379
---
INDICES
MANUAL [redacted b6]
FOIMS [redacted b7C]
CONFIDENTIAL______
AI notes AI These notes: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it. Commentary by the AI model that transcribed this page. It may bring in context the page itself does not state. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI FD-36 transmittal form header showing transmission via AIRTEL, dated January 16, 1992. No precedence or classification boxes are checked.
Routing block indicating the memo is from SAC Phoenix to SAC Seattle regarding NORJAK case 164-81, with Seattle as the office of origin.
Handwritten annotation reading 'SUBJ: MISC. (UNKNOWN)' with a redacted block below it, marked b6/b7C.
Body text indicating Phoenix is forwarding a letter and newspaper article received by FBI Tucson from a redacted individual. Further investigation is deferred to Seattle's discretion.
Index check marks, partially illegible.
Distribution block showing 2 copies to Seattle with 4 enclosures via registered mail, 1 copy to Phoenix, and a redacted entry, totaling 3.
FBI processing stamps showing the document was searched and serialized, with a date stamp of February 5, 1992, and a case reference partially legible.
Footer of the FD-36 form with approval/transmission fields left blank. Bates number DB Cooper-29379.
Indices check block in top-right corner with MANUAL and FOIMS entries redacted under b6/b7C exemptions, and a CONFIDENTIAL line.
Some redacted blocks (b6/b7C exemptions) obscure names and details Stamps at bottom are partially legible