Document date 27 April 1972AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 71 p. 162 (DB Cooper-30432), Teletype, dated 27 Apr 1972, serial SE 164-81-3138 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-71/pages/162
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
SE 164-81
PAGE FOUR
---
PHOTOS ARE OF SAME INDIVIDUAL. [REDACTED] ADVISED THAT PHOTO-
GRAPH OF HIM WEARING THE WIG WAS TAKEN A COUPLE OF MONTHS
AGO IN FRONT OF A WIG SHOP ON PACIFIC AVENUE, BREMERTON,
WASHINGTON, WHEN HE WAS IN THE COMPANY OF [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] STATES [REDACTED] TOOK HIS PHOTOGRAPH WITH
A POLAROID CAMERA AND THAT THE WIG WAS BORROWED FROM THE
WIG SHOP UNDER THE GUISE OF PURCHASING SAME. [REDACTED] ADVISED
THE PHOTOGRAPH WAS TO BE USED BY [REDACTED] TO BE
SHOWN TO A FEMALE PURCHASER OF [REDACTED] AS
HE UNDERSTOOD THIS FEMALE EXPECTED TO BE ROMANCED AS PART
OF THE SALE. [REDACTED] STATES THE PHOTOGRAPH WAS NEVER SHOWN
TO THIS INDIVIDUAL, BECAUSE HE DECIDED AGAINST IT AND RE-
QUESTED THE [REDACTED] NOT TO DO SO.
[REDACTED] UNDERSTOOD THIS WOMAN RECEIVED A LARGE
SUM OF MONEY, EITHER FROM AN ESTATE OR A SETTLEMENT OR BOTH
AND WAS INTERESTED IN INVESTING IT IN [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] FURTHER STATED [REDACTED] TOLD HIM THIS WOMAN
[REDACTED] IN SEATTLE ON THE
WATERFRONT OR [REDACTED] CLOSE BY.
[REDACTED] SPENT QUITE A WHILE DISCUSSING
THIS, AND [REDACTED] ASKED WHO WAS GOING TO LOOK AT HIM ROMAN-
TICALLY, AND THEN IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT HE COULD WEAR A
WIG AND IT BECAME A SORT OF A JOKE, AND THAT IS HOW THE
PHOTOGRAPH WAS TAKEN.