Document date 27 April 1972AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: read it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO
ACQUAINTANCES HOW LONG HE HAS HAD THIS BEARD.
INFORMATION FROM [REDACTED] AND [REDACTED] INDICATES [REDACTED] STAYED AT THE
SWEPT INN MOTEL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FEBRUARY SIXTEEN LAST. SEATTLE
SHOULD IMMEDIATELY DETERMINE THE TELEPHONE CALLS MADE BY [REDACTED] AND
IDENTIFY EACH SUBSCRIBER.
REFERENCED SEATTLE TELETYPE STATES CONSIDERATION IS BEING
GIVEN TO A REVIEW OF BOEING FILES FOR PERSONS TERMINATED JANUARY
SEVENTY TO APRIL SEVENTY. THIS REVIEW SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY
INSTITUTED WITH SUFFICIENT MANPOWER TO EXPEDITIOUSLY HANDLE. IT
WOULD APPEAR NUMEROUS INDIVIDUALS IN THIS REVIEW COULD BE ELIMINATED
BY SEX, AGE, AND OTHER FACTORS THEREBY DIMINISHING THE NUMBER OF
FILES THAT WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE TO BE REVIEWED. /THE PHOTOGRAPH O[F]
THE SUSPECT WITH OR WITHOUT THE WIG SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY SHOWN
TO SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL AT BOEING HAVING THE SAME APPROXIMATE
TENURE (FIFTEEN YEARS) AS THE SUSPECT TO DETERMINE IF THEY CAN
IDENTIFY THIS PERSON. POSTING OF PHOTOGRAPHS ON THE EMPLOYEE
BULLETIN BOARD IS NOT SUFFICIENT AND YOU ARE EXPECTED TO MAKE
EXHAUSTIVE CONTACTS WITH ON-DUTY EMPLOYEES TO IDENTIFY THESE
PHOTOGRAPHS.
THE IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONS CALLED FROM [REDACTED] HOME
END PAGE TWO