Teletype · Director to field offices re fingerprint comparison results · 23 December 1971 · page 2 of 2AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 23 December 1971AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 92 p. 191 (DB Cooper-41065), Teletype, dated 23 Dec 1971, serial PD 164-41-554 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-92/pages/191
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO
---
JOHNSON, FBI NUMBER FIVE ONE FOUR THREE NINE THREE A, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED], FBI NUMBER [REDACTED], HARRY
WILLIAM CELK, U.S. COAST GUARD NUMBER ONE ONE SEVEN SIX EIGHT
NAUGHT, DOUGLAS COOPER, DOB APRIL TWENTYFOUR TWENTYFIVE IN CHESHIRE
ENGLAND, [REDACTED], FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] REMAINING LATENT FINGERPRINTS WHICH IS TIP IMPRESSION
AND LATENT IMPRESSION COMPARED INSOFAR AS POSSIBLE WITH FINGER-
PRINTS OF ABOVE NAMED INDIVIDUALS BUT NO IDENTIFICATION EFFECTED.
NO PALM PRINTS HERE FOR NAMED INDIVIDUALS. FINGERPRINT RECORD FOR
[REDACTED], FBI NUMBER [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] TEMPORARILY NOT AVAILABLE. COMPARISONS WILL BE CONDUCTED WHEN
RECORD LOCATED AND YOU WILL BE ADVISED SEPARATELY IF IDENTIFICATION
EFFECTED.