AirtelSAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re palm prints of NORJAK suspect Robert Wesley Rackstraw5 May 1978page 1 of 3
fbi_formLegibility: high

Part 96, page 159

DB Cooper-43077Serials SC 164-50, SE 164-81, SF 164-220

Document date 5 May 1978

Open in FBI Vault (Part 96, page 159 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 96 p. 159 (DB Cooper-43077), Airtel, dated 5 May 1978 — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-96/pages/159

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

FD-36 (Rev. 7-27-76)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET [X] Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ EFTO ☐ CLEAR

AIRTEL Date 5/5/78 ----------------------------------------------------- TO: [REDACTED] AC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM [REDACTED] AC, SACRAMENTO (164-50) (P) SUBJ NORJAK (A) O: Seattle

Re: ROBERT WESLEY RACKSTRAW Sub Number 934 933

---

Re Seattle airtel to Sacramento dated 4/7/78.

Suspect RACKSTRAW was approached by SA [REDACTED] on 4/24/78, at the San Joaquin County Jail, French Camp, California, and he refused palm prints or interview without permission of his attorney. He identified his attorney as [REDACTED]. [REDACTED] was contacted and he advised SA [REDACTED] that he did not desire to have his client interviewed concerning NORJAK, but that he was agreeable to palm prints being taken.

On 5/4/78, SA [REDACTED] returned to the jail to take the palm prints, but RACKSTRAW again declined and advised that he wanted SA [REDACTED] to contact his attorney, [REDACTED] Oakland, California, telephone [REDACTED]. He stated that [REDACTED] is his primary attorney, [REDACTED] in Calaveras County.

[REDACTED] was telephonically contacted by SA [REDACTED] on 5/4/78, and he advised that it would be necessary for the government to get a court order to obtain the palm prints. He stated RACKSTRAW has denied being D. B. COOPER, but he does not want his client interviewed concerning it nor will he cooperate in the investigation as it might possibly not be in RACKSTRAW's best interest.

---

Ø Seattle 3-San Francisco (164-220) 2-Sacramento Approved: [REDACTED] (7) Transmitted ________ (Number) (Time) DB Cooper-43077

SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ MAY 1 0 1978