Document date 4 January 1974AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: read it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
LA 164-497
---
On 12/19/73, [REDACTED] advised telephone number
[REDACTED] was a published number which was disconnected
on [REDACTED]. The subscriber was [REDACTED]
[REDACTED], Van Nuys, California.
---
The billing for this telephone had been sent to
[REDACTED] at the above address and indicate [REDACTED]
had telephone services at [REDACTED] and residence phones of
[REDACTED].
---
On 12/20/73,
[REDACTED] adjacent to the address of [REDACTED]
Van Nuys, California, positively identified the photo of
[REDACTED] as identical to a man who had operated
[REDACTED]. She
advised that [REDACTED] had [REDACTED]
---
She stated the [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. She advised that the
[REDACTED], who has been in this area for some time. She did
not know the degree of association between [REDACTED].
---
[REDACTED] stated she had been a [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
---
She stated that about two weeks ago on a Wednesday,
12/7/73, morning she had observed a sign in the window which read
[REDACTED]
---
She added that a couple of days prior to this a sign
had been observed in the window indicating [REDACTED]