Urgent facsimile teletype San Diego to Minneapolis and Portland re NORJAK suspect
Document date 4 January 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-08:064-064
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-08:064-064 Document: Urgent facsimile teletype San Diego to Minneapolis and Portland re NORJAK suspect Id: Cooper-Part-08:064-064 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A064-064 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 8 p. 64 (DB Cooper-83), Teletype, dated 4 Jan 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A064-064
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
F B I
Date: 1/4/72 PLAINTEXT (FACSIMILE)
Transmit the following in [handwritten: illegible] (Type in plaintext or code) Via [TELETYPE - struck through] URGENT (Priority)
---
TO: MINNEAPOLIS PORTLAND (164-41) FROM: SAN DIEGO (164-91)
NORJAK
RE SUSPECT [REDACTED] AKA [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
FOR INFORMATION RECEIVING OFFICES, ON DECEMBER THIRTY, SEVENTY ONE, [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, WERE INTERVIEWED AND ADVISED THAT COMPOSITE SKETCH OF UNSUB WAS IDENTICAL IN EVERY FEATURE TO THAT OF A [REDACTED] [REDACTED] IN NINETEEN SIXTY THREE AND SIXTY FOUR.
INSTANT DATE, [REDACTED] FURNISHED PHOTOGRAPHS OF [REDACTED] BY AIRTEL DATED INSTANT DATE, RECEIVING OFFICES ARE BEING SENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF [REDACTED]
MINNEAPOLIS. PORTLAND. UPON RECEIPT, DISPLAY PHOTOS OF [REDACTED] TO WITNESSES. CONSIDER UNSUB DANGEROUS. PENDING.
---
164-91 TMK: jam (1) Approved [illegible signature] / Special Agent in Charge
Pd - 5:45pm TLA Sent MP - 4:45[illegible] M Per [REDACTED]
[Stamp: 1(64 91-3[illegible]]
DB Cooper-83
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.