San Diego to Minneapolis and Portland re NORJAK lead

Document date 4 January 1972

Part 78page 1281 pageDB Cooper-33948

Open in FBI Vault (Part 78, page 128 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-78:128-128

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-78:128-128

Document: Teletype San Diego to Minneapolis and Portland re NORJAK lead
Id: Cooper-Part-78:128-128
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-78%3A128-128

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 78 p. 128 (DB Cooper-33948), Teletype, dated 4 Jan 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-78%3A128-128

FBI Date: 1/4/72 PLAINTEXT (FACSIMILE) Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via _TELETYPE_ URGENT (Priority)

---

TO: MINNEAPOLIS PORTLAND (164-41)

FROM: SAN DIEGO (164-91)

NORJAK

RE SUSPECT [REDACTED] AKA [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

FOR INFORMATION RECEIVING OFFICES, ON DECEMBER THIRTY, SEVENTY ONE, [REDACTED]

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, WERE INTERVIEWED AND ADVISED THAT COMPOSITE SKETCH OF UNSUB WAS IDENTICAL IN EVERY FEATURE TO THAT OF A [REDACTED] IN NINETEEN SIXTY THREE AND SIXTY FOUR.

INSTANT DATE, [REDACTED] FURNISHED PHOTOGRAPHS OF [REDACTED]

BY AIRTEL DATED INSTANT DATE, RECEIVING OFFICES ARE BEING

---

SENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF [REDACTED] MINNEAPOLIS, PORTLAND. UPON RECEIPT, DISPLAY PHOTOS OF [REDACTED] TO WITNESSES. CONSIDER UNSUB DANGEROUS. PENDING.

---

b6 b7C b7D

---

DB Cooper-33948

Serials: PD 164-41, SD 164-91

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.