SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re recontact of NORJAK caller
Document date 30 August 1979
Also filed at: Part 42 pp. 427–428
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-09:192-193
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:192-193 Document: Memo SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re recontact of NORJAK caller Id: Cooper-Part-09:192-193 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A192-193 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 pp. 192–193 (DB Cooper-896), Memo, dated 30 Aug 1979, serial SD 164-91-166 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A192-193
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
TO : SAC, SEATTLE DATE: 8/30/79
FROM : SAC, SAN DIEGO (164-91) (RUC)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: Seattle)
---
On 8/24/79, [REDACTED b6/b7C/b7D] [REDACTED] California, telephone [REDACTED] was contacted at her residence relative to an earlier call to the San Diego Office in which [REDACTED] claimed to have possible information regarding captioned matter.
She advised that [REDACTED] who resides in [REDACTED] Washington, had [REDACTED] which he had [REDACTED] Washington. She further identified [REDACTED] as being employed with [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Tacoma, Washington.
[REDACTED] claimed that [REDACTED] to the captioned hijacking. [REDACTED] refused to furnish the identity of [REDACTED] stating that [REDACTED] had been developed during the investigation and stating that to divulge the [REDACTED] would not mean anything". She further advised that [REDACTED] that the hijacker, using the name D. B. COOPER, was actually a [REDACTED] (LNU). who is the [REDACTED] Tacoma-Seattle area who is supposed to be a [REDACTED] who committed his first and last crime, that being captioned skyjacking. [REDACTED] (LNU) is also supposed to be [REDACTED] According to [REDACTED] the skyjacker had bailed out of the aircraft [REDACTED] the area that they thought he would have bailed out, [REDACTED] According to [REDACTED] the skyjacker had bailed out of the aircraft [REDACTED] [The] skyjacker [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] refused to furnish any additional information and during the course of the interview exhibited strange
---
2 - Seattle 1 - San Diego
[initials: RUC-[signature]] [signature] [initials: .dgm dgm (3)]
164-91-166 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
DB Cooper-896
[two circular marks — likely binder holes or redaction stamps]
---
SD 164-91
behavior and made statements that did not appear to be entirely rational.
Additionally, she claimed to have furnished the above information to the Seattle Office telephonically during the previous week, speaking to some "female agent".
The above information is furnished for the informa- tion of Seattle, and leads emanating from the foregoing information are being left to the discretion of office of origin.
Serials: SD 164-91, SD 164-91-166