SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re female informant's NORJAK claims (duplicate copy)
This copy: Part 68 p. 83Also filed at Part 42 p. 429 (primary)
This copy’s own title
SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re California woman's NORJAK information
Document date 30 August 1979
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 42 p. 429.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Part of: SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re recontact of NORJAK caller
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-68:083-083
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-68:083-083 Document: Memo SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re California woman's NORJAK information Id: Cooper-Part-68:083-083 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A083-083 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 68 p. 83 (DB Cooper-28803), Memo, dated 30 Aug 1979 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A083-083
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
TO: SAC, SEATTLE DATE: 8/30/79
[REDACTED]: SAC, SAN DIEGO (164-91) (RUC)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: Seattle)
---
On 8/24/79, [REDACTED], California, telephone [REDACTED], was contacted at her residence relative to an earlier call to the San Diego Office in which [REDACTED] claimed to have possible information regarding captioned matter.
She advised that [REDACTED], who resides in [REDACTED], Washington, had [REDACTED] [REDACTED], which he had [REDACTED], Washington. She further identified [REDACTED] as being employed with [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Tacoma, Washington.
[REDACTED] claimed that [REDACTED] to the captioned hijacking. [REDACTED] refused to furnish the identity of [REDACTED], stating that [REDACTED] had been developed during the investigation and stating that to divulge the [REDACTED] would not mean anything". She further advised that [REDACTED] that the hijacker, using the name D. B. COOPER, was actually a [REDACTED] (LNU), who is the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Tacoma-Seattle area who is supposed to be a [REDACTED] who committed his first and last crime, that being captioned skyjacking. [REDACTED] (LNU) is also supposed to be [REDACTED]. According to [REDACTED] the skyjacker had bailed out of the aircraft [REDACTED] the area that they thought he would have bailed out, [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. According to [REDACTED] the skyjacker had bailed out of the aircraft [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. The skyjacker [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] refused to furnish any additional information and during the course of the interview exhibited strange [guess: behavior].
---
SEARCH [REDACTED] [partially illegible] SERIALIZED [REDACTED] 197[REDACTED]
DB Cooper-28803
---
(2) - Seattle 1 - San Diego (3)
Serials: SD 164-91