SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK (164-41-1477)

Document date 10 October 1975

Part 9page 3801 pageDB Cooper-1096

Open in FBI Vault (Part 9, page 380 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-09:380-380

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:380-380

Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK (164-41-1477)
Id: Cooper-Part-09:380-380
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A380-380

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 p. 380 (DB Cooper-1096), Airtel, dated 10 Oct 1975, serial PD 164-41-1177 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A380-380

10/10/75

---

AIRTEL AIRMAIL

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK

---

RE: [REDACTED]

On 10/9/75, [REDACTED] Gladstone Police Department, Gladstone, Oregon, advised that an informant, known [REDACTED] as a reliable person, suggested to him as a suspect in this matter one [REDACTED] is reportedly a white male, age 40's, 6', 160 - 170 pounds, medium build, black hair, medium cut; [REDACTED] complexion: resident of [REDACTED] Washington; former [REDACTED] currently employed as [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Washington.

[REDACTED] advised his informant suspects [REDACTED] because of his [REDACTED] the fact that he bears a close resemblance to the composite sketch of unsub, and his familiarity with, and residence in, [REDACTED] Washington.

---

LEAD

SEATTLE

AT [REDACTED] COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Will conduct logical investigation to involve or eliminate [REDACTED] in this matter.

---

2-Seattle 2-Portland

RPH:krv (4) KW

[right side stamp:] 164-41-1177 [or similar] Searched Serialized Indexed Filed DB Cooper-1096

Serials: PD 164-41, PD 164-41-1177, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.